Our directory of things of interest

University Directory

Rich and poor countries cover the climate crisis very differently

Rich and poor countries cover the climate crisis very differently
14 Nov
A review of climate crisis coverage in the global media has revealed that rich countries and poor countries take a very different approach to environmental reporting

Last October, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released its landmark climate crisis report. The IPCC declared that the planet is on track for a 3-4°C temperature rise, and that even a global temperature rise of 1.5°C would see humans facing unprecedented climate-related risks and weather events. Yet, despite the dramatic nature of the report, only 28 of the 50 biggest US newspapers covered the findings.

Stay connected with the Geographical newsletter!
signup buttonSince its inception in 1935, Geographical has reported on many thousands of global issues, allowing readers to look past the boundaries and borders of our world and take a broader perspective. In these turbulent times, we’re still committed to telling expansive stories from across the globe, highlighting the everyday lives of normal but extraordinary people. Stay informed and engaged with Geographical.

Get Geographical’s latest news delivered straight to your inbox every Friday!

It is statistics such as these that prompted Hong Tien Vu, an assistant professor of journalism at the University of Kansas, to investigate the ways in which media across the globe portrays the climate crisis and to analyse which national traits most influence the coverage.

The analysis looked at more than 37,000 articles, hailing from 85 news sources and 45 countries across every continent. In doing so, he and his team attempted to select a representative sample of media outlets, covering the full range of political ideologies. From there, they overlaid the article data with country data, such as economic development, weather and energy consumption.

The study revealed that while all countries cover the climate crisis differently, clear themes do emerge. Across the board, a sense of immediacy and an analysis of concrete policy solutions was missing. More specifically, the most reliable predictor of the way a nation portrayed the climate crisis turned out to be gross domestic product per capita. In general, richer countries framed the issue as a domestic, political one, while poorer countries framed it as an international issue that the world at large needs to tackle. Richer countries also focused more on the actual climate science.

Though the results don’t particularly surprise Vu, he finds them disheartening. ‘It confirmed something that I didn’t really want to hear,’ he says. ‘I think we need to increase the coverage of climate change in richer countries. This is where the conversation should begin, because richer countries are where we have most resources to fight [the effects of the climate crisis].’ The issue is important because Vu says that ‘not only can framing have an impact on how an issue is perceived but on whether and how policy is made on the issue.’

While increasing coverage may be possible, changing the way the climate crisis is discussed could be more difficult, in part because of one of journalism’s central tenets. ‘The news media in general tends to like conflict,’ Vu says. ‘That makes climate change an attractive topic to talk about when it is portrayed in light of a conflict.’ It is this approach that encourages the sort of politicised content Vu has seen plenty of, too often focusing on or giving equal weight to those who doubt climate science or on debates around the correct allocation of resources.

‘If they’re still debating whether it exists, or whether we should allocate more resources to it, then that means that we’re not taking action,’ says Vu. ‘In the US, people are still talking about the existence of climate change. If you’re still debating that, it means a very limited amount of action has been taken.’

Get Geographical delivered to your door!
signup buttonAs we brace ourselves on our personal islands, it can be hard to picture the processes of the planet continuing to whir. Marooned in our homes, it’s vital that we stay positive, motivated and informed. Geographical is committed to helping you explore the world from the comfort of your sofa. Get the world delivered to your door, with Geographical.

Subscribe today to Geographical’s monthly print and digital magazine and save 30% off the cover price! 

Related items

NEVER MISS A STORY - Follow Geographical on Social

Want to stay up to date with breaking Geographical stories? Join the thousands following us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram and stay informed about the world.

More articles in NATURE...


Photography competition, Earth Photo, returns for the third year with…


A new study reveals the process behind the strange phenomenon…


Hunting is a topic that attracts polarised viewpoints. But as…


A compilation of 50-years worth of data on human activity…


From the US to the Mediterranean, herds of goats are…


Meet the 2020 Whitley Award winners


Protecting the most famous members of the animal kingdom may…


With Milan announcing an ambitious new plan to reduce air…


Loss of tourism revenue is having a worrying impact on…


Researchers studying marine heatwaves in the northeast Pacific, known as…


The notion that the Covid-19 pandemic all began because one…


The price of oil is plummeting – Angus Parker takes…


With so much to see on our doorsteps, this is…


A new decade-spanning study, in which the longest migration of…


Marco Magrini analyses the implications of the COP26 delay


Covid-19 has forced us to reduce destructive atmospheric behaviours and…


Recruiting armies of albatrosses could enable the detection of illegal…


What better time to get reading? We’ve collected some of…