Our directory of things of interest

University Directory

Australia: no way

Protests in Melbourne against Australia’s treatment of refugees Protests in Melbourne against Australia’s treatment of refugees Takver
20 Jun
Australia has met asylum seekers trying to reach the country by boat with a simple ‘No’. As the EU struggles with a similar problem, Geographical looks at Australia’s policies

Illegal Maritime Arrivals (IMA) is the term the Australian authorities use for illegal immigrants who decide to risk everything on a dangerous sea journey to the Australian mainland.

The migrants come from Iran, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and Vietnam. But the third largest group have no state at all. These are often Rohingya people from Myanmar, according to Paul Power, chief executive officer of the Refugee Council of Australia.

‘There is very little protection available to people fleeing these places: surrounding states often do not formally recognise people who have fled persecution,’ says Power. ‘Asylum seekers and refugees may not have access to work rights, permission to remain, educational opportunities for children or access to affordable healthcare in countries such as Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia.’

Between 2011 and 2012, 7,300 IMAs came to Australia. By 2012 to 2013 the numbers had increased to 18,000.

The Australian Government’s response has been to militarise asylum operations, under an initiative called Operation Sovereign Borders.

Since September 2013, migrant boats have been intercepted and returned to the country of origin. As the above video suggests, the message is a firm ‘No’ to anyone seeking refuge illegally in Australia.

‘The Australian Government has been trying to use social media campaigns of this kind for some years. There is no evidence to suggest that these deterrence measures work, particularly in situations where people are desperate to get to what they hope will be a place of enduring safety,’ says Power.

Supporters of the Operation Sovereign Borders argue that it has prevented migrant exploitation and deaths by deterring people smugglers who organise the poorly maintained rafts and boats that carry migrants.

Screen Shot 2015-06-19 at 11.59.12(Image: Australian Customs and Border Protection Service)

IMAs fell to 9,702 between 2013–2014, almost half the number seen in 2012–2013. Of those, 59 per cent were granted refugee status and leave to remain in Australia.

In May, Peter Dutton, Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, claimed that there had been no successful IMAs in Australia since June 2014. ‘We remain committed to returning boats that try to reach our shores illegally by turning them back where it’s safe to do so,’ he said.

Australia also operates offshore processing for asylum seekers on the Pacific island Nauru, and on Papua New Guinea. Run using private contractors, these centres have been criticised by human rights groups. A 2013 Amnesty International report summarised conditions at one detention centres:

Asylum seekers often arrive on Manus Island [Papua New Guinea] with little clothing – their possessions are usually stolen by smugglers before they reach Australia, and their remaining belongings are confiscated by Australian authorities on Christmas Island. The clothing provided in the detention centre is usually limited to one or two t-shirts and pairs of shorts, two pairs of underwear, and a single pair of socks. They receive flip-flops but no shoes, meaning that they cannot take part in the short excursions outside the detention centre that are among the few activities offered to detainees.

Australia’s government has committed to expanding its Refugee and Humanitarian Programme, which has 13,750 spaces for refugees in 2014–2015. Numbers are to increase to 18,750 places by 2018–2019.

In short, Australia’s policies have deterred migrants from taking to the sea – probably sparing many death and exploitation – but at a cost to the rights of the migrants caught in detention camps, and those with a case for asylum in Australia.

‘Australia’s punitive and deterrence-based policies would be even more disastrous for persecuted people if they were taken up across Asia and Europe,’ says Power. ‘The Australian government has yet to realise that its interest in seeing less unregulated and uncontrolled movement in the Asia–Pacific region is best served if refugees are better protected in countries of first asylum. None of Australia’s neighbours would take Australia seriously if it tried to encourage better protection of refugees while the current suite of policies remains in place.’

Whatever happens with Operation Sovereign Borders, Europe will be watching.

For an in-depth look at the Refugee Crisis, read Mark Rowe’s complete Dossier in the latest issue, on sale now. Or click here to subscribe and never miss an issue.

Related items

geo line break v3

Free eBooks - Geographical Newsletter

geo line break v3


DurhamBath Spa600x200 Greenwich Aberystwythherts




Travel the Unknown

NEVER MISS A STORY - Follow Geographical on Social

Want to stay up to date with breaking Geographical stories? Join the thousands following us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram and stay informed about the world.